A mythological interpretation of Schelling's construction of matter

Authors

  • Miguel Angel Bastarrachea Magnani Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59437/cuj.v2i1.32

Keywords:

German Idealism, Romanticism, Naturphilosophie, Mythology, Romantic Science, potencies

Abstract

In addition to being part of the Romantic movement and German Idealism, F. W. J. Schelling had an essential participation in the strong interaction that existed between the natural sciences and speculative philosophy, particularly the philosophy of Nature (Naturphilosophie) at the end of the 18th and early 19th centuries. Such is the case of figures such as J. W. Ritter and H. C. Oersted, who used the concept of polarity to advance empirical physics. Starting from the elements of Schellingian metaphysics, the System of Identity (Identitätsystem), a detailed analysis of the speculative construction of matter in his Naturphilosophie, is presented, explaining the three levels of dynamic processes. Then, the basic elements of the Identitätsystem are briefly described. This includes the critical concept of construction, the location of the individual within a totality or universe, and that of absolute indifference, the metaphysical representation of polarity in Naturphilosophie. Expressing construction through the Theory of Powers (Potenzenlehre), it is shown how it is transferred to the field of art and mythology, the matter of poetic creations. The purpose of this work is to use these elements to exhibit, with the help of Schelling's study of the Cabiros, the divinities of Samothrace, the possibility of an exegesis of Schellingian physics and its processes from a mythological point of view. If the construction of matter is the passage from the inorganic to the organic (from Nature to the Spirit), the mythological construction is a passage from the inframundane to the supramundane, where each physical process corresponds to a divinity and vice versa, evidencing the profound and promising connection between the spiritual and natural sciences that is at the core of Schelling's task to conquer the Absolute.

References

Beach, Edward A. (1999). The Potencies of God(s). Schelling’s Philosophy of Mythology, New York: SUNY Press.

Berlin, Isaiah. (2015). Las Raíces del Romanticismo. México: Taurus.

Cassirer, Ernst. (2013). Filosofía de las formas simbólicas II. El pensamiento mítico. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bernabé, Alberto (Ed). (2003). Hieros Logos. Poesía órfica sobre los dioses, el alma y el más allá. Madrid: Akal.

Duque, Félix. (1998). Historia de la Filosofía Moderna. La Era de la Crítica. Madrid: Akal.

Frank, Manfred. (1994). El Dios venidero. Lecciones sobre la Nueva Mitología, Barcelona: Ediciones del Serbal.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2010). Mito y Razón. Madrid: Paidós.

Graves, Robert (2011). Los mitos griegos, volumen I. Madrid: Alianza.

Halmi, Nicholas. (2007). The genealogy of the romantic symbol, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holland, Jocelyn. (2009). German Romanticism and Science. The Procreative Poetics of Goethe, Novalis, and Ritter. New York: Routledge.

Horn, F. (1997). Schelling and Swedenborg. Mysticism and German Idealism. Pennsylvania: Swedenborg Foundation.

Kerényi, Karl. (2011). Misterio de los Cabiros. Ciudad de México: Sexto Piso.

Platón, (1988). Diálogos, Vol. III. Fedón. Banquete. Fedro. Madrid: Gredos.

Schelling, F. W. J, Hölderlin, F. y Hegel G. W. F. (2014). “Proyecto. El programa de sistema más antiguo del Idealismo alemán (hacia 1795)”. En Arnaldo, Javier (Ed). Fragmentos para una teoría romántica del arte, Madrid: Tecnos, pp. 229 y ss.

Schelling, F. W. J. (1856-1861). Sämmlitche Werke. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag.

–––. (2002a). Bruno o sobre el principio divino y natural de las cosas. Barcelona: Folio.

–––. (1996). “Introducción al Proyecto de un sistema de filosofía de la naturaleza o sobre el concepto de física especulativa y la organización interna de un sistema de esta ciencia (1799)” En Escritos sobre filosofía de la naturaleza. Madrid: Alianza. pp. 119-174.

–––. (1996). “Deducción general del proceso dinámico o de las categorías de la física (1800).” En Escritos sobre filosofía de la naturaleza. Madrid: Alianza. pp. 119-174.

–––. (1996). Escritos sobre filosofía de la naturaleza. Madrid: Alianza.

–––. (1999). Filosofía del arte. Madrid: Tecnos, Madrid.

–––. (2005). Sistema del idealismo trascendental. Barcelona: Anthropos.

–––. (2002b). “Sobre las divinidades de Samotracia”. Er, Revista de Filosofía. Tr. I. Giner Comín y F. Pérez-Borbujo Álvarez. Sevilla/Barcelona, 31, 133-189.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=262855

Snelders, H. A. M. (1970). “Romanticism and Naturphilosophie and the Inorganic Natural Sciences 1797-1840: An Introductory Survey”. Studies in Romanticism, 9 (3), 193-215. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25599763

Whistler, Daniel (2013). Schelling’s Theory of Symbolic Language. Forming the System of Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

2024-10-16

How to Cite

Bastarrachea Magnani, M. A. (2024). A mythological interpretation of Schelling’s construction of matter. Characteristica Universalis Journal, 2(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.59437/cuj.v2i1.32

Issue

Section

Dossier

Categories