Una lectura contemporánea de la Filosofía de la Naturaleza de Schelling en sentido experimental

María Edith Velázquez Hernández; Nalliely Hernández Cornejo

doi:10.59437/cuj.v2i1.30

Authors

María Edith Velázquez Hernández Universidad de Guanajuato
Nalliely Hernández Cornejo Universidad de Guadalajara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59437/cuj.v2i1.30

Keywords:

Philosophy of science, Organism, Experiment, A priori, Knowledge, Intervention

Abstract

Considering the studies that have stated the relationship between science and Schelling's philosophy, our objective is to advance on the same topic, trying to avoid the pretensions of adjusting Schelling's thought to a particular conception of scientificity or demonstrating its distance from it. Instead, we intend to recover from Schelling's thought some characteristics that he critically awarded to scientific knowledge to put them into discussion with contemporary positions. These characteristics show remarkable and exciting connections with the philosophy of science. Therefore, we try to show the relevance of his thought nowadays since it advances elements of the criticism of Kantianism and modern science, which will be crucial in the light of historicism and postmodern criticism. For this research advance, we will deal with the notion of experiment to note its affinity with current conceptions.

References

Arechiga,Violeta, (2014). “La teoría de la materia de la Naturphilosophie”, Metatheoria, 5(1), 7-20.

Belendez, A. (2008). “La unificación de la luz, electricidad y magnetismo: la ʻsíntesis electromagnéticaʼ de Maxwell” Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 30 (2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172008000200012

Caneva, K. L. (1997). “Physics and Naturphilosophie: a Reconnaissance” en Science History Publications Ltd, 36-106.

Engelhardt von, D. (2002). “Natural Philosophy and Natural Science around 1800” en Bevilacqua y Fregonese (eds). Nuova Voltiana: Studieson Volta and His Times, vol.4, Milano: Ulrico Hoepli, 11-27.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1981). “An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience”, en Feyerabend, P. K. Realism, Rationalism, and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 17-36.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1976). Cómo ser un buen empirista. Defensa de la tolerancia en cuestiones epistemológicas. Universidad de Valencia.

Friedman, M. (2013). Philosophy of Natural Science in Idealism and neo-Kantianism, Cambridge University Press, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/impact-of-idealism/philosophy-of-natural-science-in-idealism-and-neokantianism/234FD5665A75A562CF881DB90FC252E6

Gooding, D. (1992). “Putting agency back into experiment”. En A. Pickering (Ed.) Science as Practice and Culture (pp.65-112). Chicago University Press.

Hackin, I. (1996). Representar e intervenir. Paidós

Kant, I. (2006). Crítica de la razón pura. Taurus.

Molines, C. U. (2011). El desarrollo moderno de la filosofía de la ciencia (1890-2000). Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas UNAM:

Ortigosa, A. (2003). “La teoría del organismo del jóven Schelling a la luz de John Brown. De la Erregunstheorie a la ursprüngliche Duplicität” en Disputatio, (12) 25, https://studiahumanitatis.eu/ojs/index.php/disputatio/article/view/2023ortigosa-schelling

Pérez Quintana, A. (2002). “Filosofía de la naturaleza y ciencia: Schelling” en Montesinos, J., Ordoñez, J. y Toledo, S., Ciencia y Romanticismo, Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, 43-70.

Poovey, M. (1998). A History of Modern Fact. Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. University of Chicago Press

Richards, R. J. (2002). The Romantic Conception of Life. University of Chicago Press.

Schelling F.W.J. (1996). Escritos sobre Filosofía de la Naturaleza, Alianza Editorial.

Schelling F.W.J. (2004). Del yo como principio de la filosofía o Sobre lo incondicionado en el saber humano, Trotta.

Schelling F.W.J. (1985). Bruno o sobre el uno como principio divino de las cosas, Ediciones Orbis.

Schelling F.W.J. (1803). “Ideen zur einer Philosophie der Natur„ en Sämmtliche Werke, Erste Abtheilung, Zweite Band, Zweite Auflage, Cotta’scher Verlag, pp. 1-344

Schelling F.W.J. (1858). “Erstes Entwurf eines Systems der Naturphilosophie„ en Sämmtliche Werke, Erste Abtheilung, Dritte Band, Cotta’scher Verlag, pp. 1-268.

Schmid, J. (2018). “Schelling’s method of Darstellung: Presenting nature through experiment” en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, XXX, 1-11.

Snyder, L. J. (2021). El club de los desayunos filosóficos. Cuatro notables amigos que transformaron la ciencia y cambiaron el mundo. Acantilado.

Tritten, T. & Whistler, D. (2016). “Editorial Introduction” a Schellingean Experiments in Speculation en Angelaki, 21(4), 1-9.

Villacañas Berlanga, J. L. (1987). “Introducción” a Schelling, Textos Cardinales, Ediciones Península.